Interview as a technique of collecting information: strategy of questions

If you are strong recommended reading in biology and weak in languages, than you should probably choose biology instead of english or french.Interview as a technique of collecting information: strategy of questions

It’s important to tell apart interviews as a technique of collecting interviewing and information as a genre. That is, communication with people, is one of three ways to obtain information by a researcher in the first case, interview. Two different ways are:

  • observation, once the researcher himself can be an eyewitness associated with event,
  • working together with papers, where in fact the document means any product provider containing texts and pictures.

Kinds of interviews and their purpose

Interviews as a technique of data gathering in change are split into:

  • genre (for planning of text within the genre of interview),
  • investigative (for information),
  • reportage (to recognize the characteristics of an individual, then to mirror them when you look at the text).

The reportage interview had been talked about into the previous chapter. In regards to the investigative shall find out when you look at the chapter on information retrieval. The theme with this chapter is meeting as being a genre, as a method of text formatting by means of concerns from a interviewer therefore the answers of this interlocutor. At the same time there is an interview-monologue at one pole, where in actuality the quantity of questions of this researcher is minimized (often they are no after all), in the other pole – a discussion, if the journalist not just asks concerns, but additionally speaks much with lengthy arguments.

The fact the interview is a discussion, indicates concerning the exact same level of replicas of the journalist and interlocutor. When you look at the usual interview, the interviewer responses take 70-90% associated with the text. A discussion could be conducted by a journalist, by authority equal to the interlocutor, so that the viewpoint with this journalist has also been interesting to visitors, whilst the viewpoint regarding the interlocutor. This is a sign of insufficient qualification if an ordinary journalist speaks as much or more in an interview as an interlocutor.

Types of interviews with respect to the topic. Subject interview

With regards to the topic, you can find three forms of interviews:

  • subject,
  • personal,
  • subject-personal.

Subject of the interview that is subject their state of things in every industry of activity. Frequently this really is a job interview with a professional, a genre of logical publicism. The interlocutor is interesting towards the journalist just as much as he could be linked to this situation. As an example, an officer tells how exactly to protect a flat from thieves. A doctor describes just how to protect your self through the flu epidemic. The advisor that is financial a forecast just how long the crisis may be from the exchange. Neither the interlocutor’s opinion on problems that deviate through the meeting subject, nor the life that is private of interlocutor is of great interest.

The dwelling associated with interview that is subject of three components. First, they reveal the interlocutor’s reference to the topic. Then there’s a parsing associated with the topic for the purpose of its presentation, evaluation and clarification. The interview that is subject utilizing the streamlining of that which was said, summarizing, practical recommendations to readers.

The hero of this topic interview can additionally be an eyewitness or participant in case. This might be information interview, among the news genres. The job regarding the journalist is always to learn as much as possible the important points and information on exactly what happened. Such as the scenario of a specialist, the interlocutor’s interaction utilizing the subject is very first shown, then the topic is deepened, additionally the ending is specialized in basic impressions of what took place while the conclusions that the interlocutor made.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *